Posts Tagged carl jung

Spontaneous Authorial Flow: 5 Ways to Encourage the Mother Lode of Creative Gifts

We all want it, of course: that sense of being guided in our work by a golden thread of inspiration. It’s one of the most purely exhilarating experiences on the human experiential spectrum. You feel like what you’re writing (drawing, composing, conceiving, constructing, cultivating) is emerging effortlessly, perfectly, and you’re just the conduit. The right words and turns of phrase spring spontaneously from your fingers. Your powers and energies seem mysteriously and exquisitely aligned to bring forth exactly what you mean, and even — holy of holies, the mother lode of creative gifts — to release things you didn’t consciously know you wanted to say, but that greet you with a staggering sense of rightness when they land there on the page.

“Everybody enjoys it now and then,” says Lawrence Block in his oh-so-wonderful Telling Lies for Fun and Profit: A Manual for Fiction Writers, “when the words flow effortlessly and you feel plugged into the universal mind and the stuff on the page is worlds better than what you had in mind when you sat down. This doesn’t happen very often, but I’ll tell you it’s a kick when it does.”

Yes, it’s a kick when it happens — but it’s a sharper one when it doesn’t, and especially when you’re not just lacking that flow but are positively possessed by its opposite state. Many times in my moments of creative block, I have thought of Block’s words — and have hated them. I have thought of Kierkegaard’s description of an authorial state in which his ideas seemed to emerge fully formed, with exquisite perfection — and I have cringed. What sounds inspiring when you’re in a positive state sounds revolting and crushing when you’re in a negative one, and I have known all too well those extended states when the opposite energy from Kierkegaard’s comes over me, and everything I write emerges deformed, stillborn, or both. Maybe you’ve known this state, too.

So the question, naturally, is how to experience the divine flow state and not its opposite, how to generate or receive it, if indeed it’s a state that is accessible to effort instead of a purely supernatural-seeming endowment that categorically eludes our attempts at controlling it.

Here are several suggestions, ranging from the practical to the theoretical, that stem from my own experience and that of several other writers and artists. As you’ll see, some of these suggestions are distinctly more mundane and concrete than the psychologically and philosophically oriented advice I’ve previously offered at this blog. Remember, we’re examining creativity as a relationship between you and an independent, or independent-feeling, force or presence in your psyche. That means we’re looking at creative work as growing out of a relationship between you and the whatever-it-is in your soulspace: your muse, daimon, genius. Sometimes, as in our relationships with other people, we have to work on ourselves; sometimes, in the most humble of ways. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: 10000 hours, active imagination, active waiting, carl jung, Dealing with Creative Block, flow, jonathan fields, julie heffernan, kay redfield jamison, kierkegaard, lawrence block, malcolm gladwell, matthew mcconaughey, meditation, mindfulness, Steven Pressfield, writer's block

Ignorance, Faith, and the Discipline of the Demon Muse, Part 2

As explored in Part 1 of this series, communications from your unconscious mind are recognizable as such by the fact that they occur spontaneously. From your point of view — that is, the viewpoint of you-as-conscious-ego — the voice of the unconscious arrives in the form of involuntary promptings from a separate, independent, autonomous source within your subjectivity. This source — to restate the fundamental insight that animates this blog — is, or is equivalent to, the muse, daimon/daemon, and personal genius of classical antiquity.

(It’s also equivalent to a few additional and equally potent metaphors that we haven’t talked about yet, such as the Spanish duende as described by Federico Garcia Lorca. See “A Writer’s Guide to the Psyche, Part 1” and Part 2 for more detail about the daimon and such.)

Learning the specific “language” of your unconscious mind is therefore crucial to the cultivation of an empowered creative life. It doesn’t do you much good if your genius is trying to speak to you but you can’t understand it, or if you don’t even recognize the sound of its voice.

What you have to do is figure out, via careful attentiveness to your inner states of mind and emotion, the form(s) and the channel(s) by which and in which your inner partner wants to communicate and collaborate. We’ve already explored the general idea and some specific techniques by which you can get to know your daemon’s character (see “Getting to Know Your Creative Demon, Part 1,” Part 2, and Part 3). Now it’s time to take a look at what’s effectively the converse side of things by considering the specific ways in which your daemon tries to make itself and its wishes known to you. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: brewster ghiselin, buddhism, carl jung, creative unconscious, creativity, daemon, daimon, dorothea brande, dorothy canfield, duende, eckhart tolle, federico garcia lorca, fourth way, genius, gurdjieff, h.p. lovecraft, james bonnet, john gardner, mindfulness, morning pages, muse, Muse and Psyche: Tapping Your Deep Self, religion, sandra lee dennis, unconscious mind, zen

Ignorance, Faith, and the Discipline of the Demon Muse, Part 1

When you get into a serious study of creativity like the one we’re pursuing here at Demon Muse, it’s all too easy to lose sight of the forest among the trees. That is, it’s easy to get caught up in the attractions of ideas and theories, to the point where you forget what the whole thing is really about. This can dampen your enthusiasm for actually performing creative work, whereas recalibrating your attitude can have the opposite effect of inflaming your muse.

What it’s all about, this daimonic or daemonic approach to creativity, this muse-based theory of inspiration, this discipline of embracing your inner genius, is the alignment of your creative act with your deep creative intent. It’s about divining your daemonic passion and then letting this be your guide when you write (or compose, paint, perform, etc.).

The thing is, you can only get it right when you’re not self-conscious about it. During the act of creation itself, you can only ride the daemonic wave by focusing your attention exclusively and intensively on your sense of rightness — or, as a corrective, your sense of wrongness — as you seek to follow the thread of your passion.

So this is all to say that when you come to the actual moment of putting down words on paper, the way to unleash your demon is to forget all about it. The moment of creation isn’t the time to be reflecting on — or, God help you, deliberately trying to follow or implement — psychological theories or concepts about creativity or anything else. Rather, it’s the moment when you should abandon all reflectiveness about what you’re doing, willingly embrace a sense of ignorance (and therefore openness) about where you’re headed and how you’ll get there, and simply heed the impulse of what wants to be said.

And how, exactly, are you supposed to do that? Simple: You find and follow what feels right, for this is the irrefutable and infallible voice of your creative demon speaking. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: carl jung, creative process, creative psychology, creativity, daemon, daimon, daimonic, james hillman, muse, stephen diamond, unconscious mind

Patience, the Muse, and Real Life

Remember Elizabeth Gilbert‘s anecdote about the time Tom Waits was struck with a brilliant musical idea while driving? He spontaneously entered a new stage of his artistic life when he addressed the creative impulse as a separate, living spirit and asked it to visit him again later, since he wasn’t in a position to heed it at the moment.

Currently I’m exercising the same option, after a fashion. Relocation to a new house, combined with a couple of other pressing circumstances, have briefly put Demon Muse on pause. Posting will resume on Monday, April 12.

In the meantime, here’s a brilliant passage from Jung’s “Psychology and Literature” to pass the time. I recently reread the essay and was bowled over even more than when I first encountered it some years ago. I consider it a crucial corrective for anybody who takes the artistic vocation lightly:

Every creative person is a duality or a synthesis of contradictory aptitudes. On the one side he is a human being with a personal life, while on the other side he is an impersonal, creative process. . . . The artist is not a person endowed with free will who seeks his own ends, but one who allows art to realize its purposes through him. As a human being he may have moods and a will and personal aims, but as an artist he is “man” in a higher sense — he is “collective man” — one who carries and shapes the unconscious, psychic life of mankind. To perform this difficult office it is sometimes necessary for him to sacrifice happiness and everything that makes life worth living for the ordinary human being.

. . . . There are hardly any exceptions to the rule that a person must pay dearly for the divine gift of the creative fire. It is as though each of us were endowed at birth with a certain capital of energy. The strongest force in our make-up will seize and all but monopolize this energy, leaving so little over that nothing of value can come of it. In this way the creative force can drain the human impulses to such a degree that the personal ego must develop all sorts of bad qualities. . . in order to maintain the spark of life and to keep itself from being wholly bereft.

. . . . How can we doubt that it is his art that explains the artist, and not the insufficiencies and conflicts of his personal life? These are nothing but the regrettable results of the fact that he is an artist — that is to say, a man who from his very birth has been called to a greater task than the ordinary mortal. A special ability means a heavy expenditure of energy in a particular direction, with a consequent drain from some other side of life.

. . . . Whenever the creative force predominates, human life is ruled and molded by the unconscious as against the active will, and the conscious ego is swept along on a subterranean current, being nothing more than a helpless observer of events. The work in process becomes the poet’s fate and determines his psychic development. It is not Goethe who creates Faust, but Faust which creates Goethe.

– Carl Jung, “Psychology and Literature,” in Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933)

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreama/ / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: art, carl jung, creativity, muse

A Brief History of the Daimon (and the Genius)

If you want to enhance your creative life, one of the most potent ways to do it — and I speak from personal experience — is to get a handle on the ideas of the daimon and the personal genius. The understanding of creativity as a strange external force with which you carry on “a peculiar, wondrous, bizarre collaboration and conversation” (to quote Elizabeth Gilbert) redefines the normal view of things in our contemporary culture and empowers the artist with new gifts and responsibilities, and to this end, a conscious working knowledge of the intertwined histories of the daimon and the genius in religion, psychology, and philosophy is indispensible.

What follows is distilled from my long essay “Icons of Supernatural Horror: A Brief History of the Angel and the Demon,” which appears in my book Dark Awakenings. A shorter version appears in the two-volume encyclopedia Icons of Horror and the Supernatural.

The Parthenon (Temple of Athena) at Athens

The Greeks and their daimones

Both the idea of the daimon and the idea of the muse come to us via the ancient Greeks, who in addition to the gods and goddesses familiar to us all through the stories of classical mythology (Zeus etc.) believed in spirits they called daimones or daimons. In one respect the daimons weren’t very different from the animistic spirits that have populated the belief systems of all peoples throughout history. They were thought to be local, limited spirits who inhabited certain places, affected the weather, brought good and bad luck, and so on.

But the Greeks also held a more distinctly spiritualized or psychologized view that eventually outstripped the first. In this second version, the daimons were understood to exist deep within the human psyche or spirit, where they made themselves known through their influence upon human thoughts, emotions, attitudes, and actions. They were conceived as intermediate spirits, neither divine nor human but bridging the gap between the two realms, who mediated the will and messages of the gods to people, and vice versa. It was such a potent concept that it eventually swept through the ancient world and became one of the cornerstones of Western psychological and spiritual thought. The iconic figures of both the angel and the demon in Western religion have their origins in the ancient Greek idea of the daimons, as combined with Jewish beliefs about spiritual hierarchies, which themselves had been inherited from Zoroastrianism. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: ancient greeks, angels, artists, carl jung, daimon, daimonic, demons, genius, james hillman, muse

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline