Posts Tagged stephen king

The Secret to Writing Is Writing: A Conversation with John Langan

This is the second in the Demon Muse series of conversations with notable writers and artists about their experiences of the creative process. The first was with T.M. Wright. In this latest installment, I talk with horror writer and SUNY writing instructor John Langan.

* * *

Photo: John Langan

John Langan

I’m almost inclined to preface the following conversation with a blatantly hyperbolic claim, to wit: If you haven’t heard of John Langan, then you soon will. That’s how strongly I feel about the quality and importance of the man’s writing. And although it’s true that he may, like many horror writers, end up being known not to a general audience but only to those who actively seek out such stories, this doesn’t mean he shouldn’t have a mainstream breakthrough. Because he’s writing some really stunning stuff.

I first heard of John maybe five or six years ago when a friend, the fantasy and horror artist Jason Van Hollander, directed me to John’s story “On Skua Island,” which had been published in 2001 in The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction. I found out somewhere, maybe from Jason, that John is a creative writing teacher at SUNY New Paltz. He also teaches classes in gothic fiction and film. This interested me greatly.

In keeping with my usual mercurial reading habits (dictated by weird inner pressures and impulses that I’ll never manage to map out), I examined the story, found it hugely exciting, and then put off reading it for several years. When I finally did read it, I was positively enraptured by its thoroughly delicious deployment of classic supernatural-horrific literary tropes — all of them used quite consciously — in the service of a really fine and wholly original tale.

This was in 2009, only a few months after John’s first book, the fiction collection Mr. Gaunt and Other Uneasy Encounters, had been published (in December 2008) to an enthusiastic reception that included a starred review in Publishers Weekly. The book consists of five stories that demonstrate more of what the author had demonstrated in “On Skua Island,” which is included in its contents. I read it  and was again enraptured.

Then John’s first novel, House of Windows — a thoroughly literary exploration of the haunted house theme, as played against the family curse theme, as played out in a parable about the power of language, as played out in the lives of two career academics — came out in late 2009. I reviewed it for Dead Reckonings. Here’s a snippet of what I said: “House of Windows is a scarifyingly assured debut. It’s one of those wonderful books where you realize only a few pages in that you can relax into it and trust yourself fully to the author, since he obviously knows what he’s doing.” A host of other critics and reviewers agreed.

The story continues: His work has now been featured in editor Ellen Datlow’s The Best Horror of the Year, Volume 2, and editor Paula Guran’s The Year’s Best Dark Fantasy and Horror. He has been a judge for the Shirley Jackson Awards for the past three years. Most interesting of all — to a person like me, at least — he’s currently working on a Ph.D. through the CUNY Graduate Center, with his dissertation to be titled Lovecraft’s Progeny. It offers “a consideration of Lovecraft’s influence on Fritz Leiber, Stephen King, Ramsey Campbell, Thomas Ligotti, and Caitlin Kiernan.”

Somewhere along the way, I became Internet acquaintances with John, and that led to my inviting him to sit down in virtual space for an interview. Well, that, and the fact that his stories were pinging right and left on some of the major themes that I’ve pursued here at Demon Muse: the question of creative inspiration’s true nature, the experience of being dominated by autonomous psychic forces, and so on. I wanted to ask John about the origin of these strands in his work, and about his interesting fusion of academic themes with supernatural ones, and about the implications of these things not only for his own literary creative life but for the creative lives of anybody else who might benefit from hearing what he’s learned.

So that’s what I did. Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: creative process, creative writing, d.h. lawrence, daimon, flannery o'connor, genius, h.p. lovecraft, horror, john langan, muse, shirley jackson awards, stephen king, suny, supernatural, the magazine of fantasy & science fiction

How to Make Writing Easy: The Transformative Power of Daily Output plus Lowered Expectations

This post doesn’t relate directly to Demon Muse’s guiding theme of creativity as a muse/daemon/genius-powered phenomenon, but it does add to the advice I gave in “Advice for Writers: Dig Deep into Your Passion.” Someone recently posted a message to one of my favorite online hangouts for writers, editors, and readers to ask about 1) what sort of output, in terms of length, most writers aim for or achieve on a regular basis, 2) the degree of difference between the first drafts and final drafts produced by most working writers, and 3) advice for overcoming the “inner editor” that can lock down the creative drive by emasculating it at the inception point. This elicited a flow of words from me that’s reprinted below.

Which — as I add before turning you over to said flow of words — means there is indeed a crossover value with this blog, because my demon muse was clearly involved in the writing of this advice. When I clicked the “reply” button to contribute to that online conversation, I was expecting to write two or three sentences. Roughly a thousand words and 25 minutes later, I realized that I had slipped quietly into a flow state. Something had wanted to be said, and I was in the right place at the right time with the right attitude of receptivity. This is one manifestation of the inspired creativity we’ve been exploring here for the past several months. To be gripped by a sudden upsurge and outpouring of unexpected words and ideas is definitely a genius/muse driven experience. So is the sense of A) not knowing exactly and consciously where it’s all going, even as b) you’re intensely aware that it’s all guided by a coherent overarching energy that will make it all make sense in the end.

Yes, the writing of a single blog post or message board response is a rather minuscule example upon which to hang the principle. But it works the same in both microcosmic and macrocosmic fashions — in both short and long works, and in seemingly minor and seemingly major ones. As above, so below, and so on.

For a longer — and quite rambling — and thoroughly fascinating — look at the ins and outs of living a muse-driven life, see Jonathan Zap’s uber-essay “The Path of the Numinous: Living and Working with the Creative Muse.”

In the meantime, consider this combination of practical and attitudinal advice about the writing life: Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: creative writing, discipline, revising, stephen king, thomas ligotti, William Stafford, writer's block

To Thine Own Daemonic Self Be True

Flickr: GothicaI grew up in an Independent Christian Church, one of those conservative evangelical Protestant congregations that represent the right-leaning doctrinal divergence of some Restoration Movement churches from the über-liberal Disciples of Christ denomination circa the early and middle parts of the 20th century. One of the mottos of my childhood church, which I learned directly from the lips of my father, is this: “Where the scriptures speak, we speak; where the scriptures are silent, we are silent.”

Anybody who scents in this saying a close analog to the muse/daemon/genius-based approach to artistic creativity is surely onto something. As I said in a past post (“Embrace Your Creative Demon’s Rhythm, Part 2“), in a discussion of how important it is to find your natural creative condition, you simply can’t know your innate creative rhythm — occasional, erratic, or prolific — until you actually do the work of finding out who you are by making friends with your daemonic genius, and then by approaching your work openly and experimentally in order to discover the pace and volume at which your creativity wants to emerge. I illustrated this with examples, excerpts, and insights from the lives and works of  Philip Larkin, Alice Flaherty, Joe Hill, Amy Lowell, and Victoria Nelson.

Here I present a few more examples to illustrate the point — which, to repeat, is that there’s a wide variation among people in how their creative demons consent to being accessed and how their muses consent to being courted. The crucial thing is to get in touch, and then to stay in touch, with your own demon muse, so that when your it speaks, you speak, and when it’s silent, you remain silent.

But bear in mind that this doesn’t necessarily mean you won’t be writing the whole time. This is not a contradiction but a subtle distinction. For more such seeming contradictions, wade into the following choppy sea of advice from well-known authors. Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: Christianity, daemon, dani shapiro, discipline, flannery o'connor, gayle brandeis, jurgen wolff, muse, stephen king, Steven Pressfield

Stoking Your Creative Fire: Embrace Your Creative Demon’s Rhythm (2)

NOTE: This is a continuation and conclusion of a previous post. See “Embrace Your Creative Demon’s Rhythm (1)” for the contextual lead-in to what follows.

HandsThe myth of constant creative output

It’s common for those of us who are driven to pursue work in the creative arts to have in mind an ideal goal that we’re aiming for. Along with hopes of having our efforts recognized by an appreciative audience, probably one of the most common desires is to achieve a state of regular, and even constant, creative flow.

The reasons for this are obvious. As a matter of phenomenological fact, writing or other creative work can make you high. Even those writers (and there are plenty of them/us) for whom the actual act of writing is sometimes or always a matter of sheer drudgery have experienced those moments of deep satisfaction when everything comes together, the stars align, the chi flows, and it’s as if the universe is doing the work through you. It’s only natural to wish that it could always be this flowing, this fulfilling, this easy.

Natural — but dangerous and unrealistic. A number of unexamined assumptions lie behind the myth of perpetual creative production, and it’s hard to judge which is the more pernicious and damaging to deep and authentic creativity. The basic problem is that a person in this state is judging himself or herself according to an artificial, external, and impracticable standard. Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: alice flaherty, amy lowell, charles dickens, Dealing with Creative Block, dreams, h.p. lovecraft, harper lee, hypergraphia, inspiration, joe hill, maurice levy, muse, philip larkin, stephen king, unconscious mind, victoria nelson, writer's block

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline